jetlib.sec » Full Disclosure » Re: Arbitrary DDoS PoC

Feeds

133099 items (0 unread) in 27 feeds

• 1337day (was: Inj3ct0r, 1337db)
• OSVDB Vulnerabilities
• Exploit-DB
• SecurityFocus Vulnerabilities
• Bugtraq
• Full Disclosure
• XSSed
• Packet Storm Security Headlines
• Packet Storm Security Advisories
• Packet Storm Security Exploits
• Packet Storm Security Recent Files
• Packet Storm Security Tools
• Packet Storm Security Misc. Files
• Sophos security news
• Sophos product advisories
• Penetration Testing
• SecuriTeam
• BackTrack Linux Forums
• Threatpost
• SecDocs
• carnal0wnage.attackresearch.com
• Carnal0wnage
• Kernel Fun
• Darknet
• The Exploitant
• Hack a Day
• Wirevolution

Full Disclosure

• February 15, 2012
• 

  Re: Arbitrary DDoS PoC

  Posted: February 15th, 2012, 3:06pm PST

  Tags:   

  Posted by Grandma Eubanks on Feb 15

  Forgive me as I have not tested this, but the lone python interpreter
  handles the multistack, right? If so, this wouldn't actually span cores due
  to GIL restrictions, thus not really allowing parallell processing.
  
  *Have not looked at curl's bindings for Python, so honestly wondering if
  this is easier to handle than the multiprocessing library. If so, I might
  test around with this.
  
  **This on top of the blocking socket issues makes this...